"The Respondents state that they verified and accurately tallied the results of all the candidates in Page 6 of 25 declaring the results of the presidential elections in accordance with Article 138 (10) of the Constitution," reads part of the response.
The commission further denied claims that in more than 10,000 polling stations, data entered in KIEMS was not consistent with information and data from the respective Forms 34A.
'The data entered in KIEMS was statistics. The result of the election from each polling station was contained in Forms 34A. It is therefore incorrect to compare the statistics entered in KIEMS with the results from each polling station as contained in Forms 34A," states the response.
The commission further says statistics of results and images of scanned forms were sent from polling stations simultaneously and delays in receipt of the images of forms are attributed to their big file size and lack of steady 3G or 4G network.
It said the declaration of presidential election results was on the basis of Forms 34B from all the 290 constituency tallying centers and the diaspora.
Source
The commission further denied claims that in more than 10,000 polling stations, data entered in KIEMS was not consistent with information and data from the respective Forms 34A.
'The data entered in KIEMS was statistics. The result of the election from each polling station was contained in Forms 34A. It is therefore incorrect to compare the statistics entered in KIEMS with the results from each polling station as contained in Forms 34A," states the response.
The commission further says statistics of results and images of scanned forms were sent from polling stations simultaneously and delays in receipt of the images of forms are attributed to their big file size and lack of steady 3G or 4G network.
It said the declaration of presidential election results was on the basis of Forms 34B from all the 290 constituency tallying centers and the diaspora.
Source
